Chapter 2 Section 2.1Sector Overview

The loan outstanding of the sector stood at ₹3,33,907 Cr. in 1,040 lakh loan accounts as of 31st March 2026, with NBFC-MFIs the single largest lender category on every dimension measured.

Read More

2.1 Sector Overview

In the year 2025-26, the microfinance sector navigated a year of de-growth and sluggishness, marking the transition from a prolonged phase of portfolio stress and de-growth to consolidation and an early stage of growth recovery. The loan outstanding of the sector stood at ₹3,33,907 Cr.1 in 1,040 lakh loan accounts as of 31st March 2026. Thus, a sector that had made rapid growth after the COVID pandemic saw a year of consolidation and stabilisation.

On a year-on-year basis, loan outstanding contracted by 11% between March 2025 and March 2026. The de-growth trend that had persisted for almost eight consecutive quarters saw a turnaround in the last quarter, with 4% credit expansion over December 2025, the first positive movement since the June 2024 quarter.

The improvement in growth momentum has been accompanied by a marked strengthening of asset quality. The sector-wide PAR 30-179 DPD improved from 6.63% in March 2025 to 2.34% in March 2026, a moderation of 429 basis points, suggesting that the consolidation phase of the preceding two years has successfully established a sounder credit foundation.

The March 2026 data shows that early-stage asset quality has improved substantially across all lender categories, with PAR 30-179 DPD, PAR 60-179 DPD and PAR 90-179 DPD improving significantly from March 2025 levels. The up-to-24-Month On Book (MOB) portfolio, PAR 180+ DPD remained higher for Banks at 9.3% and SFBs at 8.2%, compared to 3.7% for NBFC-MFIs and 2.2% for NBFCs. The stress is relatively higher for Banks and SFBs, whereas NBFC-MFIs and NBFCs appear to have stronger performance for loans within their last 24-month period.

Overall, the March 2026 trend points to improving credit performance and reduced fresh slippages, but the elevated PAR 180+ DPD within the 24-MOB portfolio of Banks and SFBs indicates that deeper delinquency remains a concern in these segments. The relatively low PAR 180+ DPD levels for NBFC-MFIs and NBFCs suggest better vintage-level portfolio performance and stronger containment of delinquency, although continued monitoring will be important as the current vintages mature.

This chapter analyses the overall status of the microfinance sector using data obtained from Equifax India, a leading Credit Information Company. The analysis encompasses information from all micro-lenders operating nationwide, including Banks, Small Finance Banks (SFBs), NBFC-MFIs, NBFCs, and Others2.

Table 2.1 Microfinance Sector Snapshot as of 31st March 2026
Parameter Micro-Lender As of 31st March 2026 Micro-Lender Share (in %) Y-o-Y Growth (in %)
Loan Outstanding (in ₹ Cr.) NBFC-MFIs 1,41,663 42% -1%
Banks 85,299 26% -29%
NBFCs 46,155 14% -0.1%
SFBs 50,725 15% -13%
Others 10,064 3% 49%
Sector 3,33,907 -11%
Number of Loan Accounts (in lakhs) NBFC-MFIs 435 42% -16%
Banks 311 30% -30%
NBFCs 98 9% -20%
SFBs 160 16% -24%
Others 36 3% 50%
Sector 1,040 -21%
Micro-Lender During FY 2025-26 Micro-Lender Share (in %) Y-o-Y Growth (in %)
Amount Disbursed during FY 2025-26 (in ₹ Cr.) NBFC-MFIs 1,12,782 45% 8%
Banks 60,049 24% -34%
NBFCs 39,938 16% 13%
SFBs 32,807 13% -6%
Others 3,458 1% -38%
Sector 2,49,034 -8%
Source: Equifax India

1 Cr. and Crore have been used interchangeably throughout this entire report.

2 Others refers to Cooperative Banks, Local Area Banks, Sec. 8 Companies, Nidhi Companies, etc.

The data indicates that NBFC-MFIs are the single largest lender category on every dimension measured, accounting for 42% of loan outstanding and loan accounts, and 45% of disbursement value during FY 26. Banks, notwithstanding their retreat over the year, retain the second-largest exposure by loan outstanding, followed by SFBs, NBFCs, and the Others category of micro-lenders.

2.1.1 Key Performance Highlights

Loan Outstanding: The sector’s loan outstanding stood at ₹3,33,907 Cr. as of March 2026, a decline of 11% year-on-year. The year-on-year decline reflects the careful approach adopted by MLIs, overcoming the stress cycle through repayments, write-offs and tighter guardrails, etc. Whereas the sequential uptick signals that new originations have begun to outpace portfolio run-off, marking the onset of a fresh growth phase.

Loan Accounts: Loan accounts totalled 1,040 lakhs as of March 2026. Combined with a loan outstanding of ₹3,33,907 Cr., this implies an average outstanding balance of approximately ₹32,116 per account, an indicator of the extent to which the sector has migrated toward higher ticket lending relative to previous years.

Disbursement: Loan disbursement in the microfinance sector continued its de-growth trend through FY 2025-26, though the pace of contraction eased markedly by year-end. The sector-wide disbursement contracted by 21% in volume and 8% in value between FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26, even as the loan outstanding itself declined by 11%, indicating lenders wrote fewer but comparatively larger loans through the year.

Asset Quality: The PAR 30-179 DPD improved to 2.34% in March 2026 from 6.63% a year earlier, while PAR 90-179 DPD stood at 1.45%. This improvement was achieved partly through stronger collections on the current book, and partly through write-offs, though the PAR 180+ DPD continued to rise, indicating that legacy stressed assets are still being worked through.

Average Ticket Size (ATS): Average Ticket Size rose to ₹59,473 during FY 2025-26, up from ₹50,918 during FY 2024-25, a Y-o-Y increase of 17%. Over a five-year horizon, ATS has risen from ₹36,510 in FY 2020-21 to ₹59,473 in FY 2025-26, indicating a structural shift toward higher-value lending to established borrowers.

Average Loan Outstanding per Account: At ₹32,116 per loan account (derived from loan outstanding of ₹3,33,907 Cr. over 1,040 lakh loan accounts), average outstanding balances remain moderate relative to ATS, reflecting the amortising nature of microfinance loans and continued repayment discipline even through the stress cycle.