img
20
Sa-Dhan Patrika
Volume 6
Issue 1
'withdraw' later when the idea
have to consistently work towards
gathered momentum.
promoting these attitudes.
b.
Develop institutional relationships
d.
In addition, donors like SDC should
with partners:  This means, among
try to promote "Quality". The quality
We feel that one
dimension is important in a country
other things, that donors should make
important task for
like India where 'scale' and
'core' contributions and above all,
the donor is to
'numbers' are sometimes seen as
consider and see the organisation as
contribute towards
the only challenge. Promoting
a whole, its orientations, its culture,
securing the
quality does not mean building
its identity, its strategies and overall
autonomy and
islands of excellence. What we
effectiveness (including advocacy
identity of an
mean by quality is to constantly
a n d  influence  roles).  Such
organisation
search for 'effectiveness' in all
considerations need to bear more
actions rather than just narrowly
weight in interactions between
focus on reaching targets with
donors
and
development
efficiency as the sole driving force.
organisations than those pertaining
Quality would also mean identifying
to 'activities'. We feel that one
missing links, gaps and challenges
important task for the donor is to
that appear in the system. Quality is
contribute towards securing the
promoting innovative solutions to
autonomy and identity of an
respond to these missing links. For
organisation. A distinct and strong
instance, as the SHG movement
identity is a precondition for tapping
gathers momentum all over India,
an entity's uniqueness and overall
the next level challenge is to
potential.
c.
Promote solidarity and sharing: We
promote livelihood enhancement
skills among the SHG members.
note that knowledge sharing among
Donors like SDC could identify such
organisations
involved
in
missing links in collaboration with
development and in fighting
national stakeholders and support
poverty as well as in promoting
testing of forward looking solutions.
empowerment is rather limited. As a
government institution, SDC has to
Role of 'Human Capital' for MFIs
see to it that the outcome of its
Human and Institutional Development
interactions and support to partners
(HID) aspects in SDC's work
- be it in a material or immaterial form
In the Indian MFI context, what we
- which is enriched and transformed
observe is that there is not only lack of
by the talents and distinctiveness of
financial capital but also of human
these partners, is to be considered a
capital. Many MFIS and NGO-MFIs are
"common  good".  The  thus
still dependent on their promoters, do not
accumulated knowledge and value
have a capable second line of
is not only owned by them but is to
leadership and are project- and activity-
be shared and given to others, to all
driven rather than working towards a
those who are interested and
coherent strategic vision. Moreover,
concerned. We therefore think that
governance issues are often low on the
donors should promote much more
priority of many MFIs. The role of a
knowledge sharing (giving and
bilateral donor in this situation is to
receiving) among partners with
facilitate, in SDC terminology, human and
whom they interact with the purpose
institutional  development  (HID)
of enhancing their quality of
capacities. What does HID mean to us?
interventions and of increasing the
(See figure)
overall effectiveness of their work.
a.  Donors need to be challenged by
d.
Deal with `control' in the most
their partners (and vice versa): This is
appropriate way: If donors in their
only possible when donors and
partnerships are influenced by
partners are open, have the ability
control
attitudes
then
to be self-critical and interact with
empowerment, mutual learning and
each other on a high degree of trust.
learning-oriented interactions, which
These qualities again are a
need trust, are hardly possible. Donors
precondition for change on both
should therefore try to arrange
sides. In being aware of this fact, we
`control functions', which is part of
at SDC notice that openness and
governance, differently. Donors
being self critical is not a given. We
should see to it that simple, effective