img
7
Theme - Issues and Challenges in Governance of microFinance Institutions (mFIs): Indian Experience
MFI Governance - at the Point of Inflexion
Aparna Vishwanatham & Himani Gupta
ABSTRACT: In this article, governance has been defined as the Board and
executive processes and systems that enable the institution to identify the risks
affecting its performance and to manage them to achieve the promised returns
to its various stakeholders. Within this risk-return construct, governance is of equal
importance to all microfinance institutions, whatever be their legal form or mission
and vision. However, some of the processes and systems around governance
would change with the evolution of the institution from start-up to mature. The
nature of the relationship between the executive and the board is critical to
ensuring development of governance processes with the growth of the
organization.
objectives of the MFI, Governance is a
Governance has been defined in
critical requirement and this can be best
numerous ways. In very simple terms,
appreciated when viewed in the risk
governance has been described as a
return construct of governance. It can be
system of checks and balances whereby
safely understood that each MFI has a
a Board is established to manage the
mix of social and economic returns
managers of an institution1. The Board of
objectives ­ arithmetically, the weights
Directors, through the management,
assigned to each may differ, depending
guides the institution in the fulfillment of
on the mission or vision of the
its mission and protects its assets over a
organization. Governance then, is about
period  of  time.  Governance  is
conceptualized as a virtuous circle that
links the shareholder to the Board, to the
clearly defining the returns
management, to the staff, to the
objectives in the mission, vision
customer and to the community at
and business plans
large2. A relatively less common view of
governance is in the framework of risk
clearly determining the decision
The Handbook
and return ­ governance is effectively
making responsibilities to identify
defined as the Board and executive
lays out the
risks, increasing transparency
processes and systems that enable the
following as the
among  stakeholders  and
institution to identify the risks affecting its
working towards achieving the
key risks faced by
performance, and to manage them to
returns objectives
an MFI
achieve the promised returns to its various
stakeholders.
Working within this construct, it would thus
appear that achieving a social objective
Risk  Return
Framework
for
MFI
and implementing best governance
Governance
practices are not mutually exclusive, and
indeed MFIs of all constitutions should aim
The microfinance sector has evidenced
towards good governance.
considerable argument and discussion
on the social and economic objectives
As the Handbook3 for Governance of MFIs
of its business, and a related question has
states "setting up mechanisms that make
been whether Governance holds much
it possible to manage risks is (thus) directly
relevance to meeting the social
related to how governance works". The
objectives.  No  matter  what  the
Handbook lays out the following as the
key risks faced by an MFI.
1
Effective Governance for Microfinance Institutions, CGAP, 1997
2
Principles and Practices of Microfinance Governance, Accion International, 1998
3
CERISE ­ IRAM, August 2005